Claude Opus 4.5 answers within a week
Six days after Gemini 3, Anthropic retakes the coding and agentic frontier. The lead at the top now changes hands in days, not years.
Eight frontier labs. One question: who reaches the top first? Every model below is plotted by when it shipped and how capable it was β watch the race climb toward the frontier.
Watch the race βA quick read of the newest events before diving into the full chart.
Six days after Gemini 3, Anthropic retakes the coding and agentic frontier. The lead at the top now changes hands in days, not years.
Google's strongest jump since Gemini 1.0 tops reasoning and multimodal boards and ships into Search's AI Mode on day one.
Moonshot AI's open-weight trillion-parameter reasoning MoE matches or beats closed frontier models on agentic benchmarks β the DeepSeek shock, repeated.
Each line is a lab; each dot is a model release. Height is its Capability Index? at launch. Hover or tap any dot for detail.
| # | Lab | Top model | Index | Gap | Released |
|---|
How the Capability Index is curated and how the timeline is maintained.
The index is a 0β100 editorial composite of frontier standing at launch, weighing reasoning, coding, knowledge, multimodality, tool use and visible adoption signals.
Release dates come from primary announcements, papers or project repositories. New models are added when they materially shift the competitive frontier or define a new open baseline.
This is not an official benchmark, leaderboard or safety evaluation. It compresses many dimensions into a single line so the broad race is easier to inspect.
GPT-4 sits high because it created a clear 2023 frontier step-change; DeepSeek-R1 sits high because it brought reasoning performance into open-weight competition.
The full curated dataset behind this page β labs, models, landmarks and sourced milestones. Free to cite and reuse with a link back.
The releases and moments that defined each leg of the race β every entry sourced.
Deep neural networks crack computer vision on GPUs β the breakthrough that kicked off the modern AI boom, years before the Transformer.
The architecture and the scaling laws that set the stage.
AI goes mainstream and the frontier becomes a multi-lab race.
Models learn to think before they answer β and to act.
Agents that work for hours; the lead measured in months.
No milestones match β try a broader search or clear the filter.
Charted Grok 4.1, GPT-5.1, Gemini 3 Pro and Claude Opus 4.5, and added 11 sourced milestones through late 2025 (Sora, the Nobel week, computer use, MCP, o3 on ARC-AGI, IMO gold, gpt-oss, Kimi K2 Thinking). New features: a live standings table, story captions on replay, two-lab compare, an MMLU axis toggle, keyboard stepping, share links, JSON/CSV downloads and an Atom feed. Fixed chart end-labels, deep links vs autoplay, sticky-header overlap and the Capability Index tooltip.
Added a new "Deep Learning Era" opening with AlexNet, and plotted AlexNet and the 2017 Transformer as foundational landmarks on the capability chart β whose time axis now compresses the early years and stretches the fiercely competitive recent ones.
Every model dot now has a source link, a permalink and keyboard-accessible tooltip details.
Initial static version with frontier-lab lanes, model dots, milestone filters and source-backed events.
A focused history of the modern AI era β from the 2012 deep-learning breakthrough and the 2017 Transformer to the frontier models of today β framed as a race between the labs pushing toward artificial general, then super, intelligence. Every milestone links to a primary source.
The vertical axis is an illustrative 0β100 composite of each model's frontier standing when it launched, blending reasoning, knowledge and coding ability. It's hand-curated for narrative clarity β a way to see the race β not an official benchmark. Ship dates are real.
Because that's the stated goal. Several of these labs were founded expressly to build superintelligence β and the gap between them at the top of the chart is now measured in months, not years.